The nationwide impact of COVID-19 on life support courses. A retrospective evaluation by Resuscitation Council UK.

Aim: To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Resuscitation Council UK Advanced Life Support (ALS) and Immediate Life Support (ILS) course numbers and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a before-after study using course data from the Resuscitation Council UK Learning Management System between January 2018 and December 2021, using 23 March 2020 as the cut-off between pre- and post-pandemic periods. Demographics and outcomes were analysed using chi-squared tests and regression models. Results: There were 90,265 ALS participants (51,464 pre-; 38,801 post-) and 368,140 ILS participants (225,628 pre-; 142,512 post-). There was a sharp decline in participants on ALS/ILS courses due to COVID-19. ALS participant numbers rebounded to exceed pre-pandemic levels, whereas ILS numbers recovered to a lesser degree with increased uptake of e-learning versions. Mean ALS course participants reduced from 20.0 to 14.8 post-pandemic (P < 0.001).Post-pandemic there were small but statistically significant decreases in ALS Cardiac Arrest Simulation Test pass rates (from 82.1 % to 80.1 % (OR = 0.90, 95 % CI = 0.86-0.94, P < 0.001)), ALS MCQ score (from 86.6 % to 86.0 % (mean difference = -0.35, 95 % CI -0.44 to -0.26, P < 0.001)), and overall ALS course results (from 95.2 %to 94.7 %, OR = 0.92, CI = 0.85-0.99, P = 0.023). ILS course outcomes were similar post-pandemic (from 99.4 % to 99.4 %, P = 0.037). Conclusion: COVID-19 caused a sharp decline in the number of participants on ALS/ILS courses and an accelerated uptake of e-learning versions, with the average ALS course size reducing significantly. The small reduction in performance on ALS courses requires further research to clarify the contributing factors.

COVID-19 HAD DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACTS on RA SYMPTOMS and FUNCTION by SEX and AGE: RESULTS from the CANADIAN EARLY ARTHRITIS COHORT (CATCH)

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Canadians with RA faced considerable uncertainty due to greater risk of infection, hospitalization, changing access to RA medications, and very limited access to in-person RA care. Further, to reduce transmission of the virus and COVID-related hospitalizations, stringent mitigation measures were implemented across the country to greatly reduce social contacts including curfews, limits on private gatherings and business closures. Little is known about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated mitigation efforts in RA. We hypothesized that women and younger adults with RA would report greater impairments in HRQL. Objectives: To compare changes in HRQL prior-to and during the COVID-19 pandemic by sex and age groups in real-world RA patients seen in routine practice settings. Methods: Data were from patients in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) who completed a study visit in the year prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (Mar 2019 through Feb 2020) and a repeat assessment during the pandemic period (Mar 2020-Jan 2022). RA disease activity was assessed using the RA Flare Questionnaire, a validated patient-reported measure of current RA disease symptoms (pain, stiffness, fatigue) and function (physical, participation). An RA-FQ score ≥ 20 was used to classify RA symptoms consistent with an RA infammatory fare. HRQL was assessed using PROMIS-29 Adult Profiles. We compared changes in mean Physical (PHS) and Mental Health (MHS) scores, and the proportion of patients with impairments in each domain (i.e., scores ≥ 55 for pain interference, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and sleep and ≤45 for physical function and participation) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic across sex and age groups (<40, 40-64, ≥65 years). Results: The 938 CATCH participants in the analytic sample with data available at both time periods had a mean (SD) age of 60 (13) and RA symptom duration of 5.8 (3.7) years;72% were women, 88% were white, and 64% reported >high school education. Most (80%) were in CDAI REM/LDA at the most recent visit prior to start of pandemic. The proportion of patients with RA-FQ ≥20 were similar at both time periods. While physical and emotional RA symptom impacts remained stable in men prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, women reported signifcant increases in anxiety and depression during the pandemic period. Younger RA patients <40 reported increases in depression, and older RA patients (65+) reported increases in anxiety and greater impacts on participation. Conclusion: Our results illustrate that while the proportions of patients with high infammatory disease activity were similar prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed disproportionate impacts on HRQL by sex and age with a higher proportion of women, adults <40, and those ≥65 years of age experiencing greater impairments in several HRQL domains.

MORE THAN HALF of RA PATIENTS with A LIFETIME HISTORY of MOOD DISORDERS WERE ANXIOUS and DEPRESSED during the COVID-19 PANDEMIC: RESULTS from the CANADIAN EARLY COHORT (CATCH) STUDY

Background: A growing number of studies indicate the considerable mental health impacts of the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic in the general population as chronic stress is a risk factor for the development of depression and anxiety. Mood disorders are more prevalent in RA and a history of anxiety or depressive disorders increases the risk of recurrence in the future. Objectives: To compare trends in prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms, prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic in RA patients with and without a lifetime history of mood disorders. Methods: Data were from RA patients diagnosed and treated for RA in rheumatology clinics across Canada enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) Study. We estimated monthly trends in prevalence of clinically sig-nifcant levels of anxiety and depression (PROMIS Depression and Anxiety 4a score 55+) from all visits between Mar 2019 and Jan 2022 and compared monthly trends in anxiety and depression in the year prior to (Mar 2019-Feb 2020) and during the pandemic (Mar 2020 to Jan 2022) stratifed by lifetime history of mood disorders. Results: 4,148 visits were completed from Mar 2019 to Jan 2022 in 1,644 RA patients with a mean (SD) age of 60 (14) and disease duration of 6 (4) years. 73% were women, 84% white, 60% had completed some post-secondary education, and 77% were in CDAI REM/LDA at the visit closest to the start of pandemic. 253 (15%) reported a lifetime history of depression and 217 (13%) a lifetime history of anxiety;8% reported prior treatment for either. Patients with a history of mood disorders had higher levels of depression and anxiety prior-to and during the pandemic compared with patients without a history of mood disorders (Table 1). Proportions were highest during COVID waves in all and were substantially higher and more variable in people with a previous history of mood disorders as compared to those without a history (Figure 1). While depressive symptoms peaked early in the pandemic, anxiety increased with each wave, peaking in Wave 3 (May-Jun 2021). During the frst 22 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the proportion of patients with depression and anxiety increased in all groups. More than half of those with a history of emotional distress had clinically signifcant levels of depression and anxiety;proportions were highest during COVID waves in all and were substantially higher in people with previous history as compared to those without a history (see Figure 1). Whereas depressive symptoms peaked early in the pandemic, anxiety increased with each wave, peaking in Wave 3 (May-Jun 2021). Conclusion: Symptoms of anxiety and depression were common in Canadian adults with RA prior to and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas others have found that high levels of depression and anxiety occurred early in the pandemic but declined fairly rapidly in the general population1, emotional distress was not attenuated over time in this large cohort of RA patients. Individuals reporting lifetime history of mood disorders were more than twice as likely to report anxiety and depression, with depression peaking early in the pandemic and anxiety growing with each successive wave in the frst year. The results demonstrate the importance of applying a lifetime perspective as previous episodes of anxiety and depression may be an important marker of increased vulnerability and recurrence in RA patients, particularly during the pandemic.

Paradoxical effects of cigarette smoke and COPD on SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease.

BACKGROUND: How cigarette smoke (CS) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection and severity is controversial. We investigated the effects of COPD and CS on the expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor ACE2 in vivo in COPD patients and controls and in CS-exposed mice, and the effects of CS on SARS-CoV-2 infection in human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro. METHODS: We quantified: (1) pulmonary ACE2 protein levels by immunostaining and ELISA, and both ACE2 and/or TMPRSS2 mRNA levels by RT-qPCR in two independent human cohorts; and (2) pulmonary ACE2 protein levels by immunostaining and ELISA in C57BL/6 WT mice exposed to air or CS for up to 6 months. The effects of CS exposure on SARS-CoV-2 infection were evaluated after in vitro infection of Calu-3 cells and differentiated human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs), respectively. RESULTS: ACE2 protein and mRNA levels were decreased in peripheral airways from COPD patients versus controls but similar in central airways. Mice exposed to CS had decreased ACE2 protein levels in their bronchial and alveolar epithelia versus air-exposed mice. CS treatment decreased viral replication in Calu-3 cells, as determined by immunofluorescence staining for replicative double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and western blot for viral N protein. Acute CS exposure decreased in vitro SARS-CoV-2 replication in HBECs, as determined by plaque assay and RT-qPCR. CONCLUSIONS: ACE2 levels were decreased in both bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells from COPD patients versus controls, and from CS-exposed versus air-exposed mice. CS-pre-exposure potently inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro. These findings urge to investigate further the controversial effects of CS and COPD on SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Achieving treatment targets in psoriatic arthritis with apremilast in canadian practice: Real world results from appraise

Background: Real-world evidence on achieving treatment targets with apremilast (APR) in patients (pts) with PsA is limited. In the phase 3 PALACE trials, pts reached remission (REM)/low disease activity (LDA) targets at 52 wks most frequently when early APR treatment was initiated and pts were in moderate disease activity, as measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA) score. In APPRAISE, we assessed APR effectiveness/tolerability in pts with PsA in routine clinical practice in Canada. Objectives: This interim efficacy analysis focused on the available data on APR effectiveness measuring rate of achieving cDAPSA REM or LDA at 12 mos and Pt Acceptable Symptom Status (PASS) results. Methods: The prospective, multicenter, observational APPRAISE study assessed APR effectiveness/tolerability in adults with active PsA in routine clinical care enrolled from July 2018-March 2020. Pts were followed from treatment initiation to 12 mos, with visits suggested every 4 mos. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the rate of achieving at least LDA (cDAPSA <14) at 12 mos. Pt-reported outcome measures were assessed. Data reported are as observed in pts continuing APR treatment. Results: In total, 101 pts were enrolled in APPRAISE. Mean age was 52 yrs;56% were women. Mean (SD) PsA duration at baseline (BL) was 6 (8) yrs. Oligoarticular disease (≤4 joint involvement) was most common (41%), followed by polyarticular (35%). Most pts (92%) received prior conventional DMARDs and 17% received prior biologic therapy;concomitant MTX was reported in 41% at BL. By 12 mos, 41/101 enrolled pts discontinued, 35 reached 12 mos follow-up (4 mos: n=92;8 mos: n=61), and 25 have yet to reach 12 mos. The majority (92%) of discontinuations due to lack/loss of effectiveness or AEs occurred within 4-8 mos. AEs were primarily GI related early in treatment. The proportion of pts with continued APR achieving cDAPSA REM/LDA treatment targets increased significantly over time (Figure 1). Significant reductions were seen over 12 mos in swollen/tender joint counts and plaque psoriasis, with reduced mean (SD) body surface area of -4% (9%) (Table 1). Prevalence of dactylitis/enthesitis at BL, 4, 8, and 12 mos was 17%/33%, 9%/24%, 5%/19%, and 0%/21%, respectively. Pain assessment (VAS) significantly improved over time. The proportion of pts achieving PASS with continued APR increased significantly over 12 mos (BL: 27%;12 mos: 65%) (Figure 1). COVID restrictions impacted in-office assessment visits, necessitating reliance on virtual visits. Conclusion: Pts with PsA receiving APR were assessed at regular intervals in routine clinical care in Canada. This interim analysis revealed a greater number of pts receiving APR (66%) who completed the 12-mo follow-up achieved REM or LDA, as measured by cDAPSA over 12 mos. A majority of pts (65%) reported satisfaction with their disease state, as measured by PASS. No new safety signals were observed.

Valuation uncertainty – when and why this is important

Purpose: The recent coronavirus pandemic created uncertainty across most markets. This has resulted in many valuations being reported with caveats warning that they are uncertain. However, many valuers and their clients remain unclear as to what these warnings are supposed to convey and why they are required by many valuation standards, including the International Valuation Standards. The purpose of this paper is to explain how recognition of the need for uncertainty disclosures has developed over the past 25 years and how such disclosures can enhance overall trust in valuation. Design/methodology/approach: The author has been involved in the development of the guidance issued by both the International Valuation Standards Council and Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, which included extensive consultation with financial regulators and valuation users alike. He has also examined the wider economic theories of risk and uncertainty and how these need to be clearly distinguished in valuations. Findings: This paper identifies the situations under which valuation uncertainty can occur, and steps that a valuer can follow to determine whether it is sufficiently material to require an appropriate caveat to be issued alongside the valuation. It also examines the merits of different ways in which material uncertainty can be disclosed. Practical implications: The paper should provide valuers with a better understanding of the reason why uncertainty disclosures are required and the circumstances in which they are required. It also provides principles to help them formulate disclosures that are appropriate in different circumstances. Originality/value: This is an abridged version of a Valuers' Briefing “Valuation Uncertainty – Reporting the unknowable” by the author and published as either an eBook or paperback available from Amazon. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.